You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Definition of discrete for spatial vs temporal component of a time series.
Does this sentence read better, the second one, where I added bold text?
An OM_Observation whose result is a discrete coverage that varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation). Here the OM_Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
An OM_Observation whose result is a discrete coverage with respect to space, but varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation). Here the OM_Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
Neither! ;) OM_Observation no longer exists, just Observation.
If anything, I'd replace as follows:
An OMS Observation whose result is a discrete coverage that varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation) but not necessarily in space. Here the OMS Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
No specialized DiscreteCoverageObservation, we should probably define a soft-type for what we need.
Does this help?
Change:
The MonitoringFeature serves as the feature of interest for timeseries observations. It extends SF_SpatialSamplingFeature. The geometry of the MonitoringFeature is described by the 'shape' property. For timeseries observations the shape is frequently a point but may be an area polygon or other geometric object.
To
The MonitoringFeature can serve as the feature of interest for timeseries observations. It extends SF_SpatialSamplingFeature. The geometry of the MonitoringFeature is described by the 'shape' property. For timeseries observations the shape is frequently a point but may be an area polygon or other geometric object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Does this sentence read better, the second one, where I added bold text?
An OM_Observation whose result is a discrete coverage that varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation). Here the OM_Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
An OM_Observation whose result is a discrete coverage with respect to space, but varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation). Here the OM_Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
Neither! ;) OM_Observation no longer exists, just Observation.
If anything, I'd replace as follows:
An OMS Observation whose result is a discrete coverage that varies in time (c.f. OM_DiscreteCoverageObservation) but not necessarily in space. Here the OMS Observation feature type provides the spatio-temporal context for the whole timeseries.
No specialized DiscreteCoverageObservation, we should probably define a soft-type for what we need.
Does this help?
The MonitoringFeature serves as the feature of interest for timeseries observations. It extends SF_SpatialSamplingFeature. The geometry of the MonitoringFeature is described by the 'shape' property. For timeseries observations the shape is frequently a point but may be an area polygon or other geometric object.
To
The MonitoringFeature can serve as the feature of interest for timeseries observations. It extends SF_SpatialSamplingFeature. The geometry of the MonitoringFeature is described by the 'shape' property. For timeseries observations the shape is frequently a point but may be an area polygon or other geometric object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: