Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

K-means for SpCL #51

Open
yjh576 opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

K-means for SpCL #51

yjh576 opened this issue Dec 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@yjh576
Copy link

yjh576 commented Dec 22, 2021

Have you tried K-means based clustering to generate pseudo labels for SpCL? I tried it based on your open source code. However, using K-means based pseudo labels for SpCL, we got poor results. For example, mAP are 20.9% and 36.2%,respectively. When the pseudo labels of MMT are generated by K-means, its results is comparable with that of DBSCAN. I can't understand and explain this. Could you give some suggestions? Thank you in advance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant