Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website translated to RU #13

Open
aristofun opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 16 comments
Open

Website translated to RU #13

aristofun opened this issue Apr 22, 2019 · 16 comments

Comments

@aristofun
Copy link

Guys professionally translated original website to russian: https://github.com/installero/rubyinstaller.ru

Could you please encourage their effort and make some users life better by writing a news post and adding the link to rubyinstaller.ru website somewhere in the footer?

Thanks

@lex111
Copy link

lex111 commented Apr 22, 2019

cc @larskanis

@larskanis
Copy link
Member

I already asked some questions regarding the translation in #11 . I think that we need some conclusion about responsibilities and some team work to keep all translations up to date. Currently the Russian binaries are outdated and this shouldn't happen.

@stomar
Copy link

stomar commented Apr 22, 2019

How would the integrity of provided binaries be guaranteed for a site that is not owned by rubyinstaller.org?

@aristofun
Copy link
Author

Good point.

By preserving original links to all binaries, I guess. It is only website texts that are modified.

I may be wrong, but strictly speaking even "owning" the .org site doesn't guarantee the binaries integrity 100% of the time. Because of the open source and public nature of the project.

@installero
Copy link

Currently the Russian binaries are outdated

I've picked your last commits, sorry for the delay and thank's again for your work.

We'll update Russian version shortly (about a week) after yours.

@stomar
Copy link

stomar commented Apr 26, 2019

By preserving original links to all binaries, I guess. It is only website texts that are modified.

@aristofun That might be true right now, but could change at any time, unnoticed by visitors; note also that there is no guarantee that the GitHub repository really is the source for the website.

Don‘t misunderstand me, I do not want to imply any malicious intent; I simply do not know anything about rubyinstaller.ru and have currently no reason to trust the site. Therefore IMO it‘s an important consideration.

@aristofun
Copy link
Author

It's a valid point of course.
I just see no point nor reason for anybody's malicious intent in such a complicated way (by making a translation, communicating with original site owners etc.).

Also rubyinstaller.org could technically be changed at any time, unnoticed by visitors etc. Most of your considerations are applicable to .org website as well.
(it's just for the clarity of an argument of course, I'm sure everybody is doing a perfect job).

But I see a big point in supporting people making a valuable contribution to popularizing the Ruby.

PS:
if you happen to personally know Ivan Nemytchenko https://twitter.com/inem or @inem, he may confirm my and @installero identity and contribution to russian ruby/rails community we've made so far. And that both of us have ever had only good intentions in mind and in our doings.

@stomar
Copy link

stomar commented Apr 27, 2019

@aristofun Regarding your first statement: consider e.g. the infamous event-stream incident for npm. And the integrity of this project is not the point here at all (I assume the maintainers do trust themselves...)

I think it would probably be best if the translations would be incorporated into the rubyinstaller site itself.

@aristofun
Copy link
Author

Not sure how would "npm" scenario be possible if .ru and .org website repos are okay and in sync.

Could you please elaborate on the specifics of what kind of vulnerabilities you have in mind?

@stomar
Copy link

stomar commented Apr 29, 2019

Please reread my very first comment; further elaboration should not be necessary.

@aristofun
Copy link
Author

I agree with all your points except one:

How would the integrity of provided binaries be guaranteed for a site that is not owned by rubyinstaller.org?

How would the integrity of provided binaries be guaranteed for a rubyinstaller.org site?

Sorry, nothing personal, but it feels a little bit like discrimination here

@stomar
Copy link

stomar commented Apr 29, 2019

Really??? Think again about the context: You are asking the maintainers of rubyinstaller.org to promote the Russian site; they need to (or at least should) consider how to make sure that the .ru site stays in sync with their site. The integrity of rubyinstaller.org is not relevant in this context at all.

@aristofun
Copy link
Author

You're right, my ba, sorry. This way there's simply no technically reliable way to ensure integrity except trust (human factor).

@larskanis
Copy link
Member

The RubyInstaller-3.0.0-1 files and blog post are missing on https://rubyinstaller.ru . Could you please update them?

@installero
Copy link

installero commented Jan 21, 2021 via email

@installero
Copy link

installero commented Jan 26, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants