Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change example structure #36

Open
uvchik opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 7 comments
Open

Change example structure #36

uvchik opened this issue Jan 15, 2019 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@uvchik
Copy link
Member

uvchik commented Jan 15, 2019

I would like to change the structure of the example repository in the following way:

  • oemof_examples
    • solph
      • v0.1.x
      • v0.2.x
      • v0.3.x
    • windpowerlib
      • v0.1.x
    • TESPy
      • v0.1.x
    • feedinlib
      • v0.1.x
    • oemof-tabular
      • v0.0.x

@oemof/oemof-developer-group What do you think?

@uvchik uvchik self-assigned this Jan 15, 2019
@simnh
Copy link
Member

simnh commented Jan 15, 2019

Sounds great - oemof-tabular is missing ;-)

@ckaldemeyer
Copy link
Member

I would be fine!

@fwitte
Copy link
Member

fwitte commented Jan 15, 2019

I'm in. I will move the examples to the repository with the next TESPy-release.

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 16, 2019

Sounds good. I will make a proposal in the dev branch.

@jnnr
Copy link
Member

jnnr commented Jan 16, 2019

Good idea!

@uvchik
Copy link
Member Author

uvchik commented Jan 16, 2019

Have a look here:

https://github.com/oemof/oemof-examples/tree/dev

The new structure shows the oemof structure but for most people would solph name oemof. They may not even know solph. That's why I named it oemof.solph (oemof) in the readme file. Shall we make that more clear (website, readme)?

@joroeder
Copy link
Member

I think just naming the oemof solph examples "oemof.solph" is fine as well. If there is just oemof.solph it might be more clear that oemof.solph is "just" one library of oemof and that there is no hierarchy of importance. Or is there a hierarchy wanted?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants