Make implicit functors ordinary module types #42
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow definitions like:
to be separated into
by treating
functor {X : S} -> T
as a proper module type distinguishedfrom
functor (X : S) -> T
. This also forcesFoo(Bar)
to now be writtenFoo{Bar}
.This should make #28 and #35 easier, as well as paving the way to one day support implicit module parameters.
By representing the three possible kinds of functor argument (generative, applicative and implicit) properly using a variant type the patch also flushes out a number of small bugs around generative functors.