Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't need levels for implicit parameter #37

Open
lpw25 opened this issue Jun 11, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Don't need levels for implicit parameter #37

lpw25 opened this issue Jun 11, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@lpw25
Copy link
Member

lpw25 commented Jun 11, 2015

Currently we keep the level of an in-scope implicit parameter in the environment, similar to how locally abstract types are handled. Really we only need to keep the fact that the parameter is implicit, similar to how univars are handled.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lpw25