You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder if this project is not redundant with the idea of having contributing-friendly stored directly in the upstream repo in the form of HACKING.adoc pages.
These pages barely existed (they had been unchanged for years) when the current wiki was created, so I'm not blaming anyone for thinking that an outside-the-tree document would be easier to build. But now that it is more active again, I wonder if the content that is being created here would not be better there: I think that being close to the source and versioned is quite helpful -- besides the visibility gains.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that HACKING.adoc is a better location for this material. Would you like to move it over (with permission from the contributors)? Once the content is upstreamed we can delete this repository.
I wonder if this project is not redundant with the idea of having contributing-friendly stored directly in the upstream repo in the form of HACKING.adoc pages.
These pages barely existed (they had been unchanged for years) when the current wiki was created, so I'm not blaming anyone for thinking that an outside-the-tree document would be easier to build. But now that it is more active again, I wonder if the content that is being created here would not be better there: I think that being close to the source and versioned is quite helpful -- besides the visibility gains.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: