Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Monument" or "CommemorationObject" superclass? #17

Open
Stephen-Gates opened this issue Dec 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

"Monument" or "CommemorationObject" superclass? #17

Stephen-Gates opened this issue Dec 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@Stephen-Gates
Copy link
Collaborator

Following on from #8, Rob asked,

In the current ontology, the top-level class for this is a "Monument". Do you think that "CommemorationObject" would be a better superclass or is a metal stakes a Monument?

I personally prefer "CommemorationObject" as it seems to apply better to things like Plaque and Marker (if implemented). I struggle to consider a metal stake marker used to identify who is buried in a grave as a Monument.

Having said that Monument is a term commonly used in documentation; so I don't mind either way.

@rwarren2
Copy link
Contributor

Will add #CommemorationObject as a top level object.

@Stephen-Gates Stephen-Gates added the question Further information is requested label Feb 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants