Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypeScript 4.0 should actually be 3.10 #38248

Closed
5 tasks done
RyanLamanskyInsite opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
5 tasks done

TypeScript 4.0 should actually be 3.10 #38248

RyanLamanskyInsite opened this issue Apr 29, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@RyanLamanskyInsite
Copy link

Search Terms

TypeScript major

Suggestion

Adopt "semver" practices and stay on 3.x until there's a breaking change to the external API.
This request is invalid if there are important breaking changes in 4.0.

Use Cases

Some 3rd party tooling assumes TypeScript follows "semver" and has checks like ">=3.4.0 && 4.0.0" or "^3" to determine compatibility. Some of this tooling is rarely updated, so using TypeScript 4.x will add warnings or errors to uses of these tools that would otherwise have worked perfectly.

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
@nmain
Copy link

nmain commented Apr 29, 2020

Duplicate of #14116
My search term was semver

@RyanLamanskyInsite
Copy link
Author

Didn't think of that search term 🙄

I think it's safe to assume that things haven't changed so I'll just close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants