Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Schema.org docs say that you can use text in place of any other type #15

Open
cygri opened this issue Jun 11, 2011 · 0 comments
Open

Schema.org docs say that you can use text in place of any other type #15

cygri opened this issue Jun 11, 2011 · 0 comments

Comments

@cygri
Copy link
Collaborator

cygri commented Jun 11, 2011

From the schema.org documentation:

We also expect that often, where we expect a property value of type Person, Place, Organization or some other subClassOf Thing, we will get a text string.

So, where we say that the range of some property is schema:Person, we should expect to get a simple string value some of the time. Possible answers:

  1. We document proper usage. While some improper usage is expected and consumers should deal with it, we don't have to document such usage.
  2. Well, who said that schema:Person is disjoint from strings? In fact, we could translate the quote above into RDFS like this:

xsd:string rdfs:subClassOf schema:Thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant