Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
22 lines (15 loc) · 1.72 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

22 lines (15 loc) · 1.72 KB

best-practices

Documents best practices for software development within the U.S. Geological Survey

Developement

Code Reviews

Conderations when conducting code reviews:

  • Application Security – This reminds developers to handle buffer overruns, mask or remove any internal resource references, and verifying server-side validity checks to coincide with client-side ones. Often overlooked security items such as session information, transaction controls, developer back-doors, and hard-coded passwords are questioned.
  • Error Handling – This area is looked at to help ensure safe and user-friendly end-user experiences by questioning function caller notifications, assertions, and exception handling. It’s also important not to give too much information in errors, so that is examined as well. Performance – Since this is always a concern, our checklist identifies some key areas that need to be reviewed, such as recursive functions, duplicated objects, system call blocks, and busy waits.
  • Resource Leaks – Resource leaks can cause also contribute to performance issues, so the checklist includes questions regarding the freeing of allocated memory and objects, and tracking reference counts. Thread Safeness – This section helps identify the safety of global variables and any deadlock risks.
  • Functions – These certainly aren’t left out, and are reviewed to check parameter verification, out-of-bound indexes, and the initialization of variables.
  • Comments - Well commented code will be easier to operate and maintain in the long run
  • Coding Conventions - Adherence to coding standards/style/conventions (add link or references) helps to ensure consistency and readability and thus improve maintainability

DevOps

IT