You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A lot of similarity in goals - provide a common abstraction layer over different backends. It seems to focus more on SQL/dataframe backends, but it seems no reason why mongodb etc could not be added.
Minimally we can add an ibis wrapper to give access to a wider range of backends. But we should explore the possibility of making ibis more of a first-class layer, possibly even replacing the existing Database/Collection/ResultSet data model, allowing linkml-store to focus on more linkml concerns, e.g. validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
https://ibis-project.org/
A lot of similarity in goals - provide a common abstraction layer over different backends. It seems to focus more on SQL/dataframe backends, but it seems no reason why mongodb etc could not be added.
Minimally we can add an ibis wrapper to give access to a wider range of backends. But we should explore the possibility of making ibis more of a first-class layer, possibly even replacing the existing Database/Collection/ResultSet data model, allowing linkml-store to focus on more linkml concerns, e.g. validation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: