Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DB::flush_count overflow #185

Open
erasmospunk opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 72 comments
Open

DB::flush_count overflow #185

erasmospunk opened this issue May 15, 2017 · 72 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Contributor

I got a case where the DB::flush_count went over 65535 and a full database resync was needed.

Normally the flush_count would overflow after about 455 days in Bitcoin if we were indexing a fully synced node. However this is not the case if the node is not fully synced and ElectrumX manages to catch up the full node. In that scenario ElectrumX will quickly exhaust the 16bit space of the flush_count variable as it flushes to disk after each block.

Also several coins have shorter block intervals thus hitting the limit in as little as a couple of months.

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

I was surprised it took this long for a complaint. I did some work on this over a month ago but it is incomplete; I will pick it up again soon.

@kyuupichan kyuupichan self-assigned this May 16, 2017
@kyuupichan kyuupichan added the bug label May 16, 2017
@petrkr
Copy link
Contributor

petrkr commented May 27, 2017

Is that this problem?

May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: ERROR:Controller:Traceback (most recent call last):
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/controller.py", line 157, in on_future_done
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: future.result()
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/block_processor.py", line 201, in main_loop
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: await task()
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/block_processor.py", line 216, in first_caught_up
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: await self.controller.run_in_executor(self.flush, True)
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/controller.py", line 137, in run_in_executor
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: return await self.loop.run_in_executor(None, func, *args)
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/concurrent/futures/thread.py", line 55, in run
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: result = self.fn(*self.args, **self.kwargs)
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/block_processor.py", line 366, in flush
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: self.flush_history(self.history)
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/electrumx-1.0.10-py3.6.egg/server/db.py", line 437, in flush_history
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: flush_id = pack('>H', self.flush_count)
May 27 17:07:49 bohol electrumx_server.py[1755]: struct.error: 'H' format requires 0 <= number <= 65535

@bauerj
Copy link
Contributor

bauerj commented May 27, 2017

Yes.

@uruk-hai-21
Copy link

I'm not a programmer. Practically what is the problem?
There is a risk to lose the wallet?

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

ElectrumX is not a wallet. It's a public blockchain index. Your question doesn't make a lot of sense.

@uruk-hai-21
Copy link

I'm sorry, I made a mistake!
I have confused Electrumx with "Electrum Bitcoin Wallet" (electrum.org)

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

@erasmospunk - can you try the compact-hist script from 2f26e81. Once I have a couple of reports it works I'll have it run in the background of a running server.

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

erasmospunk commented Jun 24, 2017

@kyuupichan I didn't keep the databases that had this issue but I run it on Dash that is near the limit:

INFO:root:Starting history compaction...
INFO:DB:switching current directory to /path/to/dash/electrumxdb
INFO:DB:using rocksdb for DB backend
INFO:DB:opened DB for serving
INFO:DB:software version: ElectrumX 1.0.11
INFO:DB:DB version: 5
INFO:DB:coin: Dash
INFO:DB:network: mainnet
INFO:DB:height: 691,997
INFO:DB:tip: 000000000000128ef39c8088a08b53674c1fe26750a85ff64a8e51ef643590a1
INFO:DB:tx count: 3,032,454
INFO:DB:flush count: 63,405
INFO:DB:deleted 1,547 stale undo entries
INFO:DB:reorg limit is 200 blocks
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 568,616 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,172,466 rows, largest: 4, 8.1% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 584,118 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,198,997 rows, largest: 4, 16.5% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 06dcc60fe4d28abe8abd33 is large: 97,931 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 523,761 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,093,185 rows, largest: 8, 23.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 574,894 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,176,844 rows, largest: 8, 32.1% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 988d8582fa6f328c94e95a is large: 63,793 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:hashX 5987058f7f58d339d76e5c is large: 97,607 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 518,220 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,079,053 rows, largest: 8, 39.5% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 574,615 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,180,103 rows, largest: 8, 47.7% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 582,429 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,188,457 rows, largest: 8, 56.0% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 571,884 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,172,848 rows, largest: 8, 64.2% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 527250e83e6e3a7452f5a6 is large: 51,791 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX 6705914577688925e4a8b0 is large: 58,488 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 520,474 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,122,776 rows, largest: 8, 71.6% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 574,083 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,188,666 rows, largest: 8, 79.8% complete
INFO:DB:hashX ad744e1ecb43f49811decc is large: 89,738 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 552,658 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,143,296 rows, largest: 8, 87.7% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 552,613 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,150,632 rows, largest: 8, 95.5% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 313,102 rows (4.3 MB), removed 641,720 rows, largest: 8, 100.0% complete
INFO:root:History compaction complete

The db was 743M before compaction and 589M after that.

I am also running Digibyte that will hit the limit in about a week.

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kyuupichan update for Dash and Digibyte that exceeded the 65535 flush count, the compaction worked correctly.

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

Thanks! I'll get something done so it isn't a separate script.

@zilveer
Copy link

zilveer commented Nov 20, 2017

@kyuupichan how do I run compact-hist ?
do I run
python3 compact_history.py
in the db directory ?

@erasmospunk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zilveer yes, but remember to set the same environment variables as when you run electrumx normally

@fujicoin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi kyuupichan,

Running the compact_history script on a regular basis takes time and effort.
Since Fujicoin's block interval is 1 minute, it needs to be executed once every 1.5 months.
Can you improve the program to run automatically?
Or can you handle it in the exectrumX code?

Thanks,
motty

@gruve-p
Copy link
Contributor

gruve-p commented Jan 7, 2018

Same issue for Groestlcoin.
We have to run the compact_history script every 1.5 months (blocktime is 1 min).

@erasmospunk I heared from Jackie that you are adding Groestlcoin into Coinomi. Since that will need electrumx, it might affect Coinomi also.

@zilveer
Copy link

zilveer commented Jan 11, 2018

@kyuupichan is there any automated process for this now?

@zilveer
Copy link

zilveer commented Jan 11, 2018

@erasmospunk @kyuupichan how do I set same environment variables as I have for ElectrumX?
I have the environment variables located at /etc/electrumx.conf ,
I guess I should run something else then only?
python3 /db/compact_history.py

any help is appreciated.
regards

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

@zilveer no, you need to run the script manually

@luggs-co
Copy link
Contributor

luggs-co commented Feb 6, 2018

I just hit this on my Litecoin electrumx. Running compact_history.py resolved the issue.

INFO:root:Starting history compaction...
INFO:DB:switching current directory to /coins/ex-ltc
INFO:DB:using rocksdb for DB backend
INFO:DB:opened DB for serving
INFO:DB:software version: ElectrumX 1.2.1
INFO:DB:DB version: 6
INFO:DB:coin: Litecoin
INFO:DB:network: mainnet
INFO:DB:height: 1,361,447
INFO:DB:tip: 02460c78e710b3c6ab23befaaf655d676ede661cde441791598cb71312f352ca
INFO:DB:tx count: 20,614,241
INFO:DB:flush count: 65,535
INFO:DB:reorg limit is 800 blocks
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 482,955 rows (8.0 MB), removed 987,267 rows, largest: 3, 1.9% complete
INFO:DB:hashX a072489792368675f65305 is large: 56,801 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 464,907 rows (8.0 MB), removed 932,056 rows, largest: 5, 3.8% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 454,804 rows (8.0 MB), removed 937,715 rows, largest: 5, 5.6% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 450,735 rows (8.0 MB), removed 929,326 rows, largest: 5, 7.4% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 2e3de1a540181006544315 is large: 70,983 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:hashX b1cd2adefcfb5489fe9e17 is large: 72,320 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 456,680 rows (8.0 MB), removed 922,512 rows, largest: 6, 9.3% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 70a2ffae2ff6d4aab8811b is large: 53,440 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 446,602 rows (8.0 MB), removed 903,667 rows, largest: 6, 11.1% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 464,804 rows (8.0 MB), removed 925,790 rows, largest: 6, 12.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 462,887 rows (8.0 MB), removed 931,290 rows, largest: 6, 14.8% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 14a49acbbfb25d8085e227 is large: 70,388 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 473,612 rows (8.0 MB), removed 950,408 rows, largest: 6, 16.7% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 76682bce5f8d911cacf82d is large: 58,591 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 471,765 rows (8.0 MB), removed 957,865 rows, largest: 6, 18.6% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 12c70f1c63c858b1600031 is large: 70,580 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 465,127 rows (8.0 MB), removed 938,018 rows, largest: 6, 20.4% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 471,832 rows (8.0 MB), removed 954,327 rows, largest: 6, 22.3% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 9e47242a86bd98676f0a3b is large: 54,213 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX 612aed6e16ec8f7408ec3b is large: 58,731 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX ab48cd40dc608fb60aad3c is large: 71,001 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 453,687 rows (8.0 MB), removed 927,053 rows, largest: 6, 24.1% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 4345bbb80db07ad8f98041 is large: 96,875 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 426,965 rows (8.0 MB), removed 859,309 rows, largest: 8, 25.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 477,428 rows (8.0 MB), removed 971,735 rows, largest: 8, 27.8% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 471,457 rows (8.0 MB), removed 946,487 rows, largest: 8, 29.7% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 70ae02791360ff114e194c is large: 55,089 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX d4b2aaab343cda3f54f04d is large: 280,356 entries across 23 rows
INFO:DB:hashX f1d820315a973e4b43554f is large: 108,325 entries across 9 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 385,106 rows (8.0 MB), removed 791,184 rows, largest: 23, 31.2% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 327bd393203f605ae97b51 is large: 122,202 entries across 10 rows
INFO:DB:hashX fe90f22034b04e8bf3c552 is large: 166,835 entries across 14 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 407,680 rows (8.1 MB), removed 843,299 rows, largest: 23, 32.8% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 483,171 rows (8.0 MB), removed 967,339 rows, largest: 23, 34.8% complete
INFO:DB:hashX aba8b9db4ce1cf087b4959 is large: 85,704 entries across 7 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 439,544 rows (8.0 MB), removed 886,004 rows, largest: 23, 36.5% complete
INFO:DB:hashX f9ae44fd1e7bda3c656d5e is large: 63,673 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:hashX f4ee90d4c3b6669e315261 is large: 70,803 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 422,720 rows (8.0 MB), removed 876,016 rows, largest: 23, 38.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 498,671 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,007,629 rows, largest: 23, 40.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 463,089 rows (8.1 MB), removed 930,923 rows, largest: 23, 42.1% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 486,407 rows (8.0 MB), removed 988,294 rows, largest: 23, 44.0% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 486,905 rows (8.0 MB), removed 972,226 rows, largest: 23, 46.0% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 460e609124a1b7e6a9db76 is large: 98,251 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 456,768 rows (8.0 MB), removed 935,789 rows, largest: 23, 47.8% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 503,498 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,011,865 rows, largest: 23, 49.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 471,366 rows (8.0 MB), removed 952,125 rows, largest: 23, 51.7% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 0b53a2945e4ce710ed9284 is large: 55,680 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX 9f3939d9123e4117a44b87 is large: 70,546 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:hashX 517d73a86d55f143c28487 is large: 70,879 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 428,641 rows (8.0 MB), removed 856,422 rows, largest: 23, 53.5% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 488,172 rows (8.0 MB), removed 986,213 rows, largest: 23, 55.4% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 481,533 rows (8.0 MB), removed 973,207 rows, largest: 23, 57.4% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 486,085 rows (8.0 MB), removed 992,084 rows, largest: 23, 59.3% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 469,129 rows (8.0 MB), removed 944,652 rows, largest: 23, 61.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 493,875 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,004,869 rows, largest: 23, 63.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 482,323 rows (8.0 MB), removed 979,647 rows, largest: 23, 65.1% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 479,415 rows (8.0 MB), removed 972,942 rows, largest: 23, 67.0% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 466,582 rows (8.0 MB), removed 928,960 rows, largest: 23, 68.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 500,128 rows (8.0 MB), removed 1,007,263 rows, largest: 23, 70.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 497,630 rows (8.0 MB), removed 999,766 rows, largest: 23, 72.9% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 449,140 rows (8.0 MB), removed 910,120 rows, largest: 23, 74.7% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 472,171 rows (8.0 MB), removed 952,386 rows, largest: 23, 76.6% complete
INFO:DB:hashX fdb2e553d5ac12c9f011c4 is large: 65,798 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 474,040 rows (8.0 MB), removed 964,055 rows, largest: 23, 78.5% complete
INFO:DB:hashX bd32e44c16f1819dbffaca is large: 52,384 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 459,667 rows (8.0 MB), removed 932,956 rows, largest: 23, 80.3% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 472,210 rows (8.1 MB), removed 947,540 rows, largest: 23, 82.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 502,901 rows (8.2 MB), removed 997,117 rows, largest: 23, 84.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 478,412 rows (8.0 MB), removed 965,630 rows, largest: 23, 86.1% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 450,143 rows (8.2 MB), removed 947,434 rows, largest: 23, 88.0% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 470,232 rows (8.0 MB), removed 943,633 rows, largest: 23, 89.8% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 0af1de3cc97b0bbd0c6de7 is large: 98,155 entries across 8 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 447,901 rows (8.0 MB), removed 907,270 rows, largest: 23, 91.6% complete
INFO:DB:hashX f0364777f30a9a9a3488ef is large: 70,782 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 480,832 rows (8.2 MB), removed 982,766 rows, largest: 23, 93.6% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 990364d3177668d0d409f3 is large: 71,746 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 462,264 rows (8.0 MB), removed 930,576 rows, largest: 23, 95.4% complete
INFO:DB:hashX de9d8433aecb5447d549f4 is large: 61,524 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:hashX d61462346b185bcc0f99f4 is large: 70,530 entries across 6 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 454,200 rows (8.0 MB), removed 911,703 rows, largest: 23, 97.2% complete
INFO:DB:hashX 73a0cced83973163ac9dfd is large: 53,210 entries across 5 rows
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 488,369 rows (8.1 MB), removed 981,747 rows, largest: 23, 99.2% complete
INFO:DB:history compaction: wrote 197,921 rows (3.2 MB), removed 415,361 rows, largest: 23, 100.0% complete
INFO:root:History compaction complete

Is this safe to run while the server is operational, or does the service need to be stopped (which is what i did this time cause of the error anyways)

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

It has to be stopped as only one process can open the DB at a time.

@luggs-co
Copy link
Contributor

luggs-co commented Feb 6, 2018

Thanks for the quick reply.

Now the question is how can we streamline this so an admin doesn't have to do maint on coins every month or so.

@nijel
Copy link

nijel commented Apr 26, 2018

I was seeing the CRITICAL:root:ElectrumX server terminated abnormally error on Litecoin as well and running compact_history.py resolved the issue for me. If it's unclear how to integrate this into daemon, it would be great to have at least mention in the docs...

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

The answer is to do history differently. I'm working on that, but no ETA.

@benma
Copy link

benma commented May 16, 2018

Also ran into this for the first time and was quite confused. Good to hear you are working on this!

kyuupichan pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 25, 2018
- the object also manages unflushed history
- the history DB has its own version, starting at 0

This is the first step to making history management into
a separate service and to larger block sizes.

The next step is an improved history format, which I hope will both
save space and be a solution to issue #185.  The DB should be able to
upgrade in-place without re-syncing the chain.
@schildbach
Copy link

schildbach commented Apr 28, 2020

I'm now hit by this issue too (ElectrumX 1.14.0 running inside Docker). Is there now an easy way to fix this?

Answering to myself: I ran docker-compose run electrumx /bin/sh, then inside the container I executed /electrumx/electrumx_compact_history. It appears it has fixed the database problem.

@pandaatrail
Copy link

@schildbach as stated before by other guys, you need to schedule this to run "often".

By "often", I mean: it will depend on the network you'll be using (testnet, mainnet...)

In an enterprise context, on testnet, we need to schedule a compact history every 2 weeks but we do this every week, to keep it consistent with mainnet, which needs to be compacted every week to be sure it's gonna keep on living without any crash.

This number may vary in the future, as it already varied. The biggest the blockchain the more often you need to run it ? That's what has been said previously in this thread. Let's hope we won't have to do this every day :p

Note that you can directly use docker-compose exec electrumx electrumx_compact_history without the need to enter the service manually. This will help with scripting and cron.

@benma
Copy link

benma commented Apr 28, 2020 via email

@nyetwurk
Copy link

nyetwurk commented Apr 28, 2020

Why?

Because if you have to do anything inside the container while the process is stopped, you have to do it in a side car launched with the exact same parameters, env, and volumes.

If you stop PID 1 in a docker container, the container dies.

Yet another reason I really dislike docker.

@benma
Copy link

benma commented Apr 28, 2020

@nyetwurk just use the same docker run ... but with a different entrypoint or cmd. You have to supply the same env/params with or without docker, so really there is no difference.

@nyetwurk
Copy link

nyetwurk commented Apr 28, 2020

@nyetwurk just use the same docker run ... but with a different entrypoint or cmd. You have to supply the same env/params with or without docker, so really there is no difference.

For a complex container started with a deployment tool like ansible that becomes a total mess. Docker still inexpicably lacks a reliable way to convert docker inspect to a docker run command line though there are third party hack tools that do a passable job on occasion.

@fujicoin
Copy link
Contributor

If you want to get rid of regular database compaction tasks, use the electrs server. Electrs implements automatic database compaction. It has been a month since it started up, but it is operating stably.

@OracolXor
Copy link

OracolXor commented Aug 1, 2020 via email

@fujicoin
Copy link
Contributor

fujicoin commented Aug 1, 2020

@OracolXor

Electrs github:
https://github.com/romanz/electrs
https://github.com/romanz/electrs/blob/master/doc/usage.md

If you use Docker-based installation, you can compile it without fail, but it's a little troublesome. Manual installation may not compile depending on the OS version. Ubuntu 18.04 will compile without problems. If that doesn't work, there is a way to get the binaries compiled with docker out of the container.

@vlddm
Copy link

vlddm commented Sep 14, 2020

Failed to do history compaction with same error that I got for electrumx daemon using 1.15.0
Any ways to fix without syncing from scratch?

INFO:root:Starting history compaction...
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:switching current directory to /data
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:using leveldb for DB backend
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:opened UTXO DB (for sync: True)
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:UTXO DB version: 8
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:coin: BitcoinSegwit
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:network: mainnet
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:height: 648,180
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:tip: 0000000000000000000821bfdee3af8ac2ba17183e7b0d7f39c527b43477e8c3
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:tx count: 568,016,657
INFO:electrumx.server.db.DB:flushing DB cache at 1,200 MB
INFO:electrumx.server.history.History:history DB version: 1
INFO:electrumx.server.history.History:flush count: 65,535
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/electrumx/.local/bin/electrumx_compact_history", line 73, in main
    loop.run_until_complete(compact_history())
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/asyncio/base_events.py", line 587, in run_until_complete
    return future.result()
  File "/home/electrumx/.local/bin/electrumx_compact_history", line 51, in compact_history
    await db.open_for_compacting()
  File "/home/electrumx/.local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/electrumx/server/db.py", line 150, in open_for_compacting
    await self._open_dbs(True, True)
  File "/home/electrumx/.local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/electrumx/server/db.py", line 147, in _open_dbs
    await self._read_tx_counts()
  File "/home/electrumx/.local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/electrumx/server/db.py", line 115, in _read_tx_counts
    assert len(tx_counts) == size
AssertionError
CRITICAL:root:History compaction terminated abnormally

@SomberNight
Copy link
Contributor

@vlddm I think that AssertionError suggests that your DB got corrupted. Unfortuntely you probably need to sync from scratch.

@sancoder
Copy link
Contributor

sancoder commented Sep 28, 2020

Running electrumx in docker; and after upgrading to 1.15 I got bumped into this bug.

What I did to workaround is these steps:

  1. while container running I opened a shell into container
    sudo docker exec -it <container-id> sh
    (to get container id one can run sudo docker ps)
  2. edit /electrumx/electrumx_server file
    vi /electrumx/electrumx_server
  3. added 3 lines of code prior to the line if __name__ == ...
    import os, time
    while os.path.exists('/data/stop4service'):
        time.sleep(10)
  1. stopped the container
  2. created the file named 'stop4service' on the host where container's /data folder is mapped
  3. started the container
  4. opened a shell into container
    sudo docker exec -it <container-id> sh
  5. now that container is running but doing nothing, execute compact history command
    python3 /electrumx/electrumx_compact_history
  6. after history compact command finished it's ok to remove the 'stop4service' file - the container will resume

If we're gonna live with this compact_history stuff it'd be great to have such a pause for service merged into the electrumx_server script.

@SomberNight
Copy link
Contributor

SomberNight commented Oct 22, 2020

I am considering making some changes to the db schema, and as part of that have been looking at this issue.

Currently the history db schema is:

# Key: address_hashX + flush_id
# Value: sorted "list" of tx_nums in history of hashX

I'm thinking it could be changed to:

# Key: address_hashX + tx_num
# Value: <null>

This would completely do away with flush_id and compaction; although I am not sure how it would affect performance.
I quite like it that items would be constant size.

Re db size on disk, I guess it would increase it somewhat, hard to tell by how much though as it depends on address reuse and whether the db is compacted:

  • worst case for current schema is if all tx_nums are in separate items (without compaction): 18 bytes per tx
  • "average" (guess) case for current schema - two tx_nums for each address (fund-then-spend): 11.5 bytes per tx
  • best hypothetical case for current schema is if all txs in the chain touch the same address, compacted: 5 bytes per tx
  • with new schema, there would be no variance: 16 bytes per tx

What do you think @kyuupichan ?


To be clear, this is about the history db, so for current reference size (depends on when last compaction was though!), see:

$ du -h .
18G     ./meta
4.4G    ./utxo
33G     ./hist
55G     .

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

Seems worth trying, let me know how it goes.

@oven8Mitts
Copy link

I get this problem when i run the script like this (Environment variables are exported from electrumx.conf):
python3 compact_history.py

Error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "compact_history.py", line 33, in
from server.env import Env
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'server'

In the script there are these both lines:
from server.env import Env
from server.db import DB

What am I doing wrong?

I also get this error, not sure what to do.

Running in Debian w/ systemD, with LevelDb. Piping in environment with this command:

export $(cat /etc/electrumx.conf | xargs) && python3.7 /var/lib/electrumx/elect_compact.py
Also tried a similar thing in systemd with environment files, which resulted in the same error.

It seems like something is missing to define server.env, or possibly must I change server.env to something that matches my configuration?

The electrumx server operates and executes normally otherwise, outside of database compaction issues.

@oven8Mitts
Copy link

@useramuser

I was able to resolve this issue with the script mentioned in this post:
spesmilo/electrumx#88 (comment)

It seems that the script in use above has since changed and is no longer applicable to our environment.

@ronaldstoner
Copy link

ronaldstoner commented Feb 2, 2021

I encountered this same struct 'H' format 65536 bug with a testnet BitcoinSegwit setup. The compact_history script completed, but I see the same error when restarting the service. EDIT: Re-running it a second time seems to have fixed all errors and the binary is running.

@nyetwurk
Copy link

May 15, 2017

@nyetwurk
Copy link

nyetwurk commented Feb 28, 2021

One possible terrible hack (since it is pretty clear this isn't going to be fixed): run compact on startup if the db exists. That way, if it crashes, it will just run the compact script when it is run agian.

@nyetwurk
Copy link

Again, why not build compaction into electrumx itself? So at least it can be done regularly (and possibly even automatically on startup) so it can continue to be run in docker.

@kyuupichan
Copy link
Owner

Do you have a patch?

@nyetwurk
Copy link

nyetwurk commented Jul 3, 2021

Do you have a patch?

I would if spesmilo/electrumx#88 (comment) worked

And you wouldn't like it much, because it would likely be a hack to the docker container to just run it unconditionally on start up via a bash script

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests