Same appellation (coordinates)

[jpadfield]

cidoc-crm.examples/models/sampling/sampling-triples.csv

Lines 35 to 38 in 91a5c27

	_Blank Node crm:P2.has type crm:E41.Appellation
	_Blank Node crm:P2.has type aat:300248475
	_Blank Node-1 crm:P1.is identified by _Blank Node
	ngi:N-1171-00-000052-S01 crm:P1.is identified by _Blank Node

Here we have two entities with the same "appellation", which is a little unclear. In this case the "appellations" are actually coordinates, but coordinates have been removed i n the most recent draft of the CRM with the recommendation just to use appellations.

So in this case we have the same "location" defined as a E36.visual item and a E53 place, due to the required properties. And they both have the same coordinates defining there relative location.

From comments originally made by @natuk