-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update skindepth.rst #563
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update skindepth.rst #563
Conversation
add minus to beta in A(z)
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Attenuation defines the rate of amplitude loss an EM wave experiences at it prop | |||
.. _harmonic_planewaves_homogeneous_attenuation_formula: | |||
|
|||
.. math:: | |||
A(z) = A_0 e^{\beta z} | |||
A(z) = A_0 e^{-\beta z} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
must be minus in order to attenuate the amplitude.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it is positive, the "z" values must be negative. I think we can clarify this in some sentences. For example "z subsurface is between zero and -infinity". That is because, in several books, the "z" is positive, thus, the beta value in the amplitude equation must be with a minus.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @PAULGOYES,
Thank you for your contribution.
EM geosci is defined with a "Z positive is up" convention. See for example the harmonic planes derivation page (and especially figure 44): https://em.geosci.xyz/content/maxwell1_fundamentals/harmonic_planewaves_homogeneous/derivation.html
I thus believe the equation is correct as it is, with a positive sign. The negative is included in the z-value.
I can leave this PR open for now if you wish to propose some changes in the wording to make things more clear. I can also close the PR and let you create a new one. Let me know what you prefer.
Thanks again.
please, maybe it will be more clear if we add some comment like "in this derivation is used the "z positive is up" convention". Something like this: For a downgoing planewave, where is used the "z positive is up" convention, the attenuation formula is given by: ... |
Hello @thast, I spoke with my students and I found why they are confused. This is because in Fig. 44 the convention is "depth is negative in the subsurface" so, it does not need the minus in the attenuation equation. However, if you check the first experiment in "Response of a layered Earth to a plane wave" you can see this: In the subsurface the depth is positive, and "in the air media" has depth-negative. In addition, the attenuation equation on the same page (see eq 422) has the minus. |
update equation 422
update de eq 144 and some typo changes
Update MT_N_layered_Earth.rst
add minus to beta in A(z)