You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the referee's draw is carried out by Kleros, the simulations remain correct but do not cover all scenarios.
Here are the tx statements concerning the two arbitrations carried out with Kleros:
-> TRANSFER 30 xDAI From 0x9c1da9a04925bdfdedf0f6421bc7eea8305f9002 To 0x4dff727fd5002dad7e028c6987c394f1913c2137
-> TRANSFER 30.0001 xDAI From 0x62b286a93d6f720a654745a3451f71cf71481b81 To 0x06255fa39ebd18796ecccc17db8153ef58dba0a8
-> Although one or more Error Occurred [Out of gas] Contract Execution Completed
-> TRANSFER 30.0001 xDAI From 0xce9260c08272fa39c9af1307cd079dc5636bee01 To 0x06255fa39ebd18796ecccc17db8153ef58dba0a8
Since the referee's draw is carried out by Kleros, the simulations remain correct but do not cover all scenarios.
Here are the tx statements concerning the two arbitrations carried out with Kleros:
Dispute Kleros 140
Smart-contract FeatureERC20
Github:
Transaction: 324
Claim: 217
Challenge: 140
✅ Payment Kleros: Dispute 140 (challenger win)
✅ Payment:
Dispute Kleros 143
Smart-contract FeatureERC20:
Github:
Transaction: 7
Claim: 5
Challenge: 143
✅ Payment Kleros: Dispute 143
❌Payment:
Also an error occurred during a payment, its origin has not been determined, and the court's rendering is not fully understood:
Try to explain the origin of the problem and demonstrate the validity of the arbitration with the use of the FeatureERC20 smart-contract.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: