You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
for the GTIF energy transition > solar energy, could we look into the following adjustments/enhancements:
integrate the albedo proxy as an additional constraint variable. Not sure what the latest update was, there was also a separate issue, CC: @jamesemwheeler
change the layer name in the layer listing from "solar energy" to "Global Horizontal Irradiation" && do the same thing for the dataset metadata header on the right panel (currently "SOLAR ENERGY") -- first screenshot below
look into optimising the default stretch of the Global Horizontal Irradiation layers? the current stretch does not allow recognizing little nuances.. It should look a bit more like the WPD at 100m turbine height (I think we did a piecewise linear stretch)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For name and color legend generation i would like to first confirm:
is this would be the rewording you would like to have?
could you review the updated color scale ranges in the branch and let me know if they better fit the expectations? I will also copy some screenshots here, maybe that provides enough info already:
Hi @santilland and colleagues,
for the GTIF energy transition > solar energy, could we look into the following adjustments/enhancements:
integrate the albedo proxy as an additional constraint variable. Not sure what the latest update was, there was also a separate issue, CC: @jamesemwheeler
change the layer name in the layer listing from "solar energy" to "Global Horizontal Irradiation" && do the same thing for the dataset metadata header on the right panel (currently "SOLAR ENERGY") -- first screenshot below
look into optimising the default stretch of the Global Horizontal Irradiation layers? the current stretch does not allow recognizing little nuances.. It should look a bit more like the WPD at 100m turbine height (I think we did a piecewise linear stretch)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: