You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 28, 2021. It is now read-only.
Just wanted to propose and discuss a few changes for spell-list.xml. The first being 950 being set to default to be stance-able due to the majority of wizard spells being bolts and needing the stance change.
The second is that we added channel=yes to the 900s bolts. Which makes the default Spell.cast use channel instead of cast. I never really noticed it since I have custom spell casting routines that force incant as well as use the incant command for bigshot which ignores this. Is there a specific use case for adding channel here for the 900s but not for any other bolt spell causing hard RT when using Spell.cast function? I feel there likely needs to be Spell.channel and Spell.incant functionality added to lich.rbw instead of relying on spell-list.xml. But just wanted to touch base and see what everyone thought.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Just wanted to propose and discuss a few changes for spell-list.xml. The first being 950 being set to default to be stance-able due to the majority of wizard spells being bolts and needing the stance change.
The second is that we added channel=yes to the 900s bolts. Which makes the default Spell.cast use channel instead of cast. I never really noticed it since I have custom spell casting routines that force incant as well as use the
incant
command for bigshot which ignores this. Is there a specific use case for adding channel here for the 900s but not for any other bolt spell causing hard RT when using Spell.cast function? I feel there likely needs to be Spell.channel and Spell.incant functionality added tolich.rbw
instead of relying on spell-list.xml. But just wanted to touch base and see what everyone thought.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: