You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have noted mismatches in the redshifts given in the zall-pix-edr-vac.fits catalogue (DESI catalogue) when compared
to the SDSS spectroscopic catalogue. We cross-matched the GALEX-SDSS-WISE LEGACY CATALOG (GSWLC) with
sources in zall-pix-edr-vac.fits and noticed that some of the redshifts given in the DESI catalogue are drastically different
than that in the GSWLC (which uses SDSS redshifts). In the following figure, we can see this.
Following I have listed the DESI target ID, DESI redshift and redshift from the GSWLC for the four galaxies
marked in the above figure:
1.
Target ID: 39633240163617085
DESI - z: 1.6529383334623118
GSWLC - z: 0.1165
Link to the spectra: https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer/desi-spectrum/edr/targetid39633240163617085
2.
Target ID: 39633304151917538
DESI - z: 1.671210092601552
GSWLC - z: 0.0711
Link to the spectra: https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer/desi-spectrum/edr/targetid39633304151917538
3.
Target ID: 39633345683918575
DESI - z: 1.2412686596561762
GSWLC - z: 0.0418
Link to the spectra: https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer/desi-spectrum/edr/targetid39633345683918575
4.
Target ID: 39633339031750728
DESI - z: 1.657199768022857
GSWLC - z: 0.0107
Link to the spectra: https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer/desi-spectrum/edr/targetid39633339031750728
If we go to the spectra links given above, we can examine the DESI spectrum. And if we put the redshift given
by GSWLC, we will see that spectral lines are fitting correctly. Also, if we see these four objects in the Legacy
Sky viewer (given on the right side in the spectra linked above), we will be able to understand from size and
brightness that they are nearby galaxies, not galaxies at z> 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Originally reported by @pbiswas82 in desihub/redrock#254:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: