Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Oblique shock instead of cone shock #1

Open
dug20 opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Oblique shock instead of cone shock #1

dug20 opened this issue May 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
feature request invalid This doesn't seem right

Comments

@dug20
Copy link
Collaborator

dug20 commented May 23, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Currently assumes an oblique shock (i.e. 2D shock for a wedge) in front of the tangent ogive nosecone, but I think that's not technically correct and it would be better to assume a 3D cone shock.
@dug20 dug20 added invalid This doesn't seem right feature request labels May 23, 2021
@dug20
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dug20 commented Oct 17, 2021

Some examples of cone shock solvers made by others:

https://github.com/Davide-sd/pygasflow

https://gist.github.com/gusgordon/3fa0a80e767a34ffb8b112c8630c5484

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature request invalid This doesn't seem right
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dug20