Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automate the base case e2e infrastructure creation #1135

Open
Tracked by #877 ...
MSalopek opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #877 ...

Automate the base case e2e infrastructure creation #1135

MSalopek opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run

Comments

@MSalopek
Copy link
Contributor

MSalopek commented Jul 12, 2023

Create a minimal e2e setup with:

  • one provider node
  • one consumer node
  • one relayer
  • one config file + possibly a genesis template to speed up the bootstrapping

Allow this minimal infrastructure to run:

  • in a docker container
  • locally

Additional:

  • See how gm fits into this and if it can be used
@MSalopek MSalopek self-assigned this Jul 12, 2023
@MSalopek MSalopek added scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run dev-ops labels Jul 12, 2023
@mpoke mpoke added this to Cosmos Hub Sep 6, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🩹 F1: Triage in Cosmos Hub Sep 6, 2023
@mpoke mpoke added the S: Productivity Productivity: Developer tooling, infrastructure improvements enabling future growth label Sep 14, 2023
@mpoke mpoke moved this from 🩹 F1: Triage to 📥 F2: Todo in Cosmos Hub Sep 14, 2023
@mpoke mpoke removed the dev-ops label Mar 27, 2024
@MSalopek
Copy link
Contributor Author

MSalopek commented Apr 17, 2024

Instead of gm we can commit the scripts we're using locally. We can have a scripts folder in the repo.

We can add this instead: #901

@mpoke

@mpoke mpoke removed the S: Productivity Productivity: Developer tooling, infrastructure improvements enabling future growth label Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run
Projects
Status: 📥 F2: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants