You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It'll be good to move / rename the tg-voting-contract package to cw-plus (or to its own repository), and change all multisigs (the ones in cw-plus, poe-contracts, and tgrade-contracts) to use it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Makes sense. I feel like it'd more be that we'd make the cw3 spec/package properly reusable/extensible, and use it everywhere. As long as it doesn't break the spec.
Currently we have a bunch of similar but slightly different implementation of the voting logic.
Moreover: we have a
voting-contract
package that exists to supposedly avoid that.Voting contracts:
tgrade-contracts
tgrade-ap-voting
(already usesvoting-contract
)tgrade-oc-proposals
(already usesvoting-contract
)tgrade-trusted-circle
(already usesvoting-contract
)tgrade-dispute-multisig
poe-contracts
tgrade-community-pool
(already usesvoting-contract
)tgrade-validator-voting
(already usesvoting-contract
)cw-plus
cw3-fixed-multisig
cw3-flex-multisig
It'll be good to move / rename the
tg-voting-contract
package tocw-plus
(or to its own repository), and change all multisigs (the ones incw-plus
,poe-contracts
, andtgrade-contracts
) to use it.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: