Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add bool flag in custom command which was ignored before #807

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pkbhowmick
Copy link
Collaborator

@pkbhowmick pkbhowmick commented Nov 24, 2024

what

why

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved handling of command flags, allowing for more flexible storage of flag values.
    • Enhanced retrieval of boolean flag values.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated error handling for flag retrieval to ensure proper logging and graceful exits.
    • Improved argument validation with clearer error messages for mismatched argument counts.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced help command triggered when no steps are defined in command configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing the handling of command flags and improving type safety in the cmd/cmd_utils.go file. The flagsData variable's type has been updated to allow for more flexible storage of flag values, and logic for retrieving boolean flag values has been added. Additionally, error handling for flag retrieval and argument validation has been improved, ensuring clearer error messages and graceful exits when issues arise.

Changes

File Change Summary
cmd/cmd_utils.go - Updated flagsData type from map[string]string to map[string]any.
- Added logic for retrieving boolean flag values.
- Enhanced error handling for flag retrieval and argument validation in preCustomCommand function.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement bool flags without values (DEV-2122)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

minor

Suggested reviewers

  • osterman
  • johncblandii
  • gberenice
  • aknysh

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or @auto-summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @auto-title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@osterman
Copy link
Member

Can you post screenshots demonstrating the behavior.

@pkbhowmick
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Can you post screenshots demonstrating the behavior.

This is hard to demo. I need a custom command with such bool flag. Can we skip this only for this PR?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants