You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there still an intent to keep this flag reflecting the "AOT ABI" version or presumably we always will be bumping major version of WAMR instead when we break AOT ABI in the future ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Zzzabiyaka please refer to doc/semantic_version.md and WAMR-2.0.0 release notes, the last time we upgraded AOT_CURRENT_VERSION was due to the merging of new feature GC and memory64. Normally we will try our best to keep the backward compatibility of AOT ABI and not to upgrade AOT_CURRENT_VERSION, but if it is really hard to maintain (e.g. new important feature breaks the ABI), we will upgrade it.
Hi!
I see in the docs that upon breaking AOT ABI we bump
AOT_CURRENT_VERSION
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/blame/0e05b0a451008c4ae95527613537ab02e6f86e5e/doc/build_wasm_app.md#L377
Looking at git blame I am not sure we did that when we introduced version 2.x.y (which I suppose breaks the ABI for AOT)
https://github.com/bytecodealliance/wasm-micro-runtime/blame/0e05b0a451008c4ae95527613537ab02e6f86e5e/core/config.h#L87
Is there still an intent to keep this flag reflecting the "AOT ABI" version or presumably we always will be bumping major version of WAMR instead when we break AOT ABI in the future ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: