Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] The CAST operator has a logical error causing precision loss when converting floating-point values. #14149

Open
1 of 2 tasks
LingweiKuang opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@LingweiKuang
Copy link

LingweiKuang commented Nov 20, 2024

Search before asking

  • I searched in the issues and found nothing similar.

Version

version 1.3.3 (Build: ad95a7e)

Describe the bug and provide the minimal reproduce step

DROP DATABASE root.db0
CREATE DATABASE root.db0

CREATE TIMESERIES root.db0.t1 WITH datatype=FLOAT compressor=GZIP 'MAX_POINT_NUMBER'='6';
INSERT INTO root.db0(timestamp, t1) VALUES (1643027794590, 0.5522);
INSERT INTO root.db0(timestamp, t1) VALUES (1643027794600, 0.8044);

# query 1
select t1 from root.db0 where t1 <= 0.8044

# query 2
select t1 from root.db0 where cast(t1 as float) <= 0.8044

What did you expect to see?

Query 1 returned result set: 0.5522 and 0.8044

Query 2 returned result set: 0.5522 and 0.8044

What did you see instead?

Query 1 returned result set: 0.5522 and 0.8044

Query 2 returned result set: 0.5522

Anything else?

Dear IoTDB team, When using the CAST operator to convert a FLOAT value to FLOAT, the value theoretically should remain unchanged. However, the above test case indicates that a logical error causing precision loss occurs after the CAST conversion.

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • I'm willing to submit a PR!
@LingweiKuang
Copy link
Author

LingweiKuang commented Nov 20, 2024

The CAST operator has a logical error causing precision loss when converting floating-point values

@CritasWang
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your feedback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants