Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Improving arrow flight sql with Kubernetes setup #44599

Open
3 tasks done
jonasbrami opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks done

[Feature] Improving arrow flight sql with Kubernetes setup #44599

jonasbrami opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@jonasbrami
Copy link

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar issues.

Description

Related to this merge request #43281.

I am afraid of the performance degradation of using Arrow Flight SQL from outside the Kubernetes cluster because from my understanding, it would be like setting enable_parallel_result_sink = False . Would it be theoretically possible, instead of having random BE resolution for the reverse proxy, have a smarter reverse proxy that could be, for example, based on path prefix (doris-url/be1, doris-url/be2) ? Then those doris-url/be{i} would become the "advertised" urls for the grpc client and would be reachable from outside the kubernetes cluster. Do you think it would be a good idea?

Use case

Faster queries when using arrow flight sql from outside Kubernetes cluster

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@jonasbrami jonasbrami added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Nov 26, 2024
@jonasbrami jonasbrami changed the title [Feature] [Feature] Improving arrow flight sql in Kubernetes Nov 26, 2024
@jonasbrami jonasbrami changed the title [Feature] Improving arrow flight sql in Kubernetes [Feature] Improving arrow flight sql with Kubernetes setup Nov 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant