Where is your WIKI? #39

aprokopyev · 2020-05-06T01:15:39Z

Please suggest where can I read a list of features of your patch?

Is this:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Security#Kernel_hardening

actual one?

Where is a complete list of kernel options introduced by your patch?
Recommended settings for the most hardened config for a simple communication server without any need of Desktop GUI, skype, etc.

I need just a simple mail server (postfix, dovecot, rspamd), most likely on Parabola with OpenRC, but prefer 32 bit running in a full software emulated VM.

madaidan · 2020-05-06T18:14:52Z

There isn't really one. You should just look at the commit history.

[ Upstream commit 3b70683 ] ubsan report this warning, fix it by adding a unsigned suffix. UBSAN: signed-integer-overflow in drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_common.c:2246:26 65535 * 65537 cannot be represented in type 'int' CPU: 21 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Not tainted 5.7.0-rc3-debug+ #39 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 03/27/2020 Workqueue: ixgbe ixgbe_service_task [ixgbe] Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 show_stack+0x28/0x38 dump_stack+0x154/0x1e4 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0x60 handle_overflow+0xf8/0x148 __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0x34/0x48 ixgbe_fc_enable_generic+0x4d0/0x590 [ixgbe] ixgbe_service_task+0xc20/0x1f78 [ixgbe] process_one_work+0x8f0/0xf18 worker_thread+0x430/0x6d0 kthread+0x218/0x238 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <[email protected]> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

seniorm0ment · 2020-07-21T14:35:39Z

I have been looking for the same, it would be very nice to have a wiki of kernel options introduced by the patch without needing to run through the commits.

tsautereau-anssi · 2020-07-22T09:26:28Z

Well I kind of wrote such a thing for the CLIP OS documentation here. I'll see with @anthraxx if we can start with adding that to a wiki.

Lelmister101 · 2021-12-01T09:04:52Z

If a wiki is made, it would also likely be worth it to add ways to contribute and wanted features. Maybe it could be kept in the “Wiki” tab in this repo?

[ Upstream commit 4f49206 ] The following warning is displayed when the tcp6-multi-diffip11 stress test case of the LTP test suite is tested: watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [ns-tcpserver:48198] CPU: 0 PID: 48198 Comm: ns-tcpserver Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.0.0-rc6+ #39 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes] lr : 0x3f sp : ffff80000ceaa1b0 x29: ffff80000ceaa1b0 x28: ffff0000df056100 x27: ffff0000e51e5280 x26: ffff80004df75030 x25: ffff0000e51e4600 x24: 000000000000003b x23: 0000000000802080 x22: 000000000000003d x21: 0000000000000038 x20: 0000000080000020 x19: 000000000000000a x18: 0000000000000033 x17: ffff0000e51e4780 x16: ffff80004e2d1448 x15: ffff80004e2d1248 x14: ffff0000e51e4680 x13: ffff80004e2d1348 x12: ffff80004e2d1548 x11: ffff80004e2d1848 x10: ffff80004e2d1648 x9 : ffff80004e2d1748 x8 : ffff80004e2d1948 x7 : 000000000bcaf83d x6 : 000000000000001b x5 : ffff80004e2d1048 x4 : 00000000761bf3bf x3 : 000000007f1dd0a3 x2 : ffff0000e51e4780 x1 : ffff0000e3b9a2f8 x0 : 00000000db44e872 Call trace: des3_ede_encrypt+0x27c/0x460 [libdes] crypto_des3_ede_encrypt+0x1c/0x30 [des_generic] crypto_cbc_encrypt+0x148/0x190 crypto_skcipher_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xc8/0xfc [authenc] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6] esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6] xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0 xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac __xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270 xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c __tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0 tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110 tcp_rcv_established+0x3c8/0x720 tcp_v6_do_rcv+0xdc/0x4a0 tcp_v6_rcv+0xc24/0xcb0 ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu+0xf0/0x574 ip6_input_finish+0x48/0x7c ip6_input+0x48/0xc0 ip6_rcv_finish+0x80/0x9c xfrm_trans_reinject+0xb0/0xf4 tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xf8/0x134 tasklet_action+0x30/0x3c __do_softirq+0x128/0x368 do_softirq+0xb4/0xc0 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xb0/0xb4 put_cpu_fpsimd_context+0x40/0x70 kernel_neon_end+0x20/0x40 sha1_base_do_update.constprop.0.isra.0+0x11c/0x140 [sha1_ce] sha1_ce_finup+0x94/0x110 [sha1_ce] crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0 hmac_finup+0x48/0xe0 crypto_shash_finup+0x34/0xc0 shash_digest_unaligned+0x74/0x90 crypto_shash_digest+0x4c/0x9c shash_ahash_digest+0xc8/0xf0 shash_async_digest+0x28/0x34 crypto_ahash_digest+0x48/0xcc crypto_authenc_genicv+0x88/0xcc [authenc] crypto_authenc_encrypt+0xd8/0xfc [authenc] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 echainiv_encrypt+0x144/0x1a0 [echainiv] crypto_aead_encrypt+0x2c/0x40 esp6_output_tail+0x1c8/0x5d0 [esp6] esp6_output+0x120/0x278 [esp6] xfrm_output_one+0x458/0x4ec xfrm_output_resume+0x6c/0x1f0 xfrm_output+0xac/0x4ac __xfrm6_output+0x130/0x270 xfrm6_output+0x60/0xec ip6_xmit+0x2ec/0x5bc inet6_csk_xmit+0xbc/0x10c __tcp_transmit_skb+0x460/0x8c0 tcp_write_xmit+0x348/0x890 __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x44/0x110 tcp_push+0xb4/0x14c tcp_sendmsg_locked+0x71c/0xb64 tcp_sendmsg+0x40/0x6c inet6_sendmsg+0x4c/0x80 sock_sendmsg+0x5c/0x6c __sys_sendto+0x128/0x15c __arm64_sys_sendto+0x30/0x40 invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x170/0x194 do_el0_svc+0x38/0x4c el0_svc+0x28/0xe0 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xbc/0x13c el0t_64_sync+0x180/0x184 Get softirq info by bcc tool: ./softirqs -NT 10 Tracing soft irq event time... Hit Ctrl-C to end. 15:34:34 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs block 158990 timer 20030920 sched 46577080 net_rx 676746820 tasklet 9906067650 15:34:45 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs block 86100 sched 38849790 net_rx 676532470 timer 1163848790 tasklet 9409019620 15:34:55 SOFTIRQ TOTAL_nsecs sched 58078450 net_rx 475156720 timer 533832410 tasklet 9431333300 The tasklet software interrupt takes too much time. Therefore, the xfrm_trans_reinject executor is changed from tasklet to workqueue. Add add spin lock to protect the queue. This reduces the processing flow of the tcp_sendmsg function in this scenario. Fixes: acf568e ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets through tasklet") Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b377add ] Both the function that migrates all the chunks within a region and the function that migrates all the entries within a chunk call list_first_entry() on the respective lists without checking that the lists are not empty. This is incorrect usage of the API, which leads to the following warning [1]. Fix by returning if the lists are empty as there is nothing to migrate in this case. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c:1266 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0> Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 Comm: kworker/0:37 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00883-g94a65f079ef6 #39 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0x2c0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x4a0 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Fixes: 6f9579d ("mlxsw: spectrum_acl: Remember where to continue rehash migration") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4628e9a22d1d84818e28310abbbc498e7bc31bc9.1713797103.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Both the function that migrates all the chunks within a region and the function that migrates all the entries within a chunk call list_first_entry() on the respective lists without checking that the lists are not empty. This is incorrect usage of the API, which leads to the following warning [1]. Fix by returning if the lists are empty as there is nothing to migrate in this case. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 at drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_acl_tcam.c:1266 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0> Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 6437 Comm: kworker/0:37 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc3-custom-00883-g94a65f079ef6 #39 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700/VMOD0005, BIOS 5.11 01/06/2019 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_all+0x1f1/0x2c0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0x6c/0x4a0 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 worker_thread+0x2cb/0x3e0 kthread+0xd0/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> Fixes: 6f9579d ("mlxsw: spectrum_acl: Remember where to continue rehash migration") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Tested-by: Alexander Zubkov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4628e9a22d1d84818e28310abbbc498e7bc31bc9.1713797103.git.petrm@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit f6944d4 ] Lockdep reports the below circular locking dependency issue. The mmap_lock acquisition while holding pci_bus_sem is due to the use of copy_to_user() from within a pci_walk_bus() callback. Building the devices array directly into the user buffer is only for convenience. Instead we can allocate a local buffer for the array, bounded by the number of devices on the bus/slot, fill the device information into this local buffer, then copy it into the user buffer outside the bus walk callback. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc5+ #39 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ CPU 0/KVM/4113 is trying to acquire lock: ffff99a609ee18a8 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] but task is already holding lock: ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 __might_fault+0x5c/0x80 _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x60 vfio_pci_fill_devs+0x9f/0x130 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_walk_wrapper+0x45/0x60 [vfio_pci_core] __pci_walk_bus+0x6b/0xb0 vfio_pci_ioctl_get_pci_hot_reset_info+0x10b/0x1d0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x1cb/0x400 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #2 (pci_bus_sem){++++}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 down_read+0x3e/0x160 pci_bridge_wait_for_secondary_bus.part.0+0x33/0x2d0 pci_reset_bus+0xdd/0x160 vfio_pci_dev_set_hot_reset+0x256/0x270 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_ioctl_pci_hot_reset_groups+0x1a3/0x280 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_ioctl+0x3b5/0x400 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0x7e/0x140 [vfio] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #1 (&vdev->memory_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 down_write+0x3b/0xc0 vfio_pci_zap_and_down_write_memory_lock+0x1c/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_basic_config_write+0x281/0x340 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_config_do_rw+0x1fa/0x300 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_config_rw+0x75/0xe50 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0xea/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] vfs_write+0xea/0x520 __x64_sys_pwrite64+0x90/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&vdev->vma_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0 validate_chain+0x465/0x530 __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0 vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] __do_fault+0x31/0x160 do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0 __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720 handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460 fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0 follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &vdev->vma_lock --> pci_bus_sem --> &mm->mmap_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: block dm-0: the capability attribute has been deprecated. CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(pci_bus_sem); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&vdev->vma_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by CPU 0/KVM/4113: #0: ffff99a25f294888 (&iommu->lock#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: vfio_dma_do_map+0x60/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] #1: ffff99a243a052a0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vaddr_get_pfns+0x3f/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 4113 Comm: CPU 0/KVM Not tainted 6.9.0-rc5+ #39 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge T640/04WYPY, BIOS 2.15.1 06/16/2022 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x64/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x131/0x150 check_prev_add+0xeb/0xcc0 ? add_chain_cache+0x10a/0x2f0 ? __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 validate_chain+0x465/0x530 __lock_acquire+0x4e4/0xb90 lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? lock_is_held_type+0x9a/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x97/0xde0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? lock_acquire+0xbc/0x2d0 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_mmap_fault+0x35/0x1a0 [vfio_pci_core] __do_fault+0x31/0x160 do_pte_missing+0x65/0x3b0 __handle_mm_fault+0x303/0x720 handle_mm_fault+0x10f/0x460 fixup_user_fault+0x7f/0x1f0 follow_fault_pfn+0x66/0x1c0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vaddr_get_pfns+0xf2/0x170 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_pages_remote+0x348/0x4e0 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_pin_map_dma+0xd2/0x330 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_dma_do_map+0x2c0/0x440 [vfio_iommu_type1] vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl+0xc5/0x1d0 [vfio_iommu_type1] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x8d/0x170 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250 ? __lock_release+0x5e/0x160 ? rcu_core+0x8d/0x250 ? lock_release+0x5f/0x120 ? sched_clock+0xc/0x30 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xb/0x190 ? irqtime_account_irq+0x40/0xc0 ? __local_bh_enable+0x54/0x60 ? __do_softirq+0x315/0x3ca ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare.part.0+0x97/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f8300d0357b Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c 89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 75 68 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f82ef3fb948 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f8300d0357b RDX: 00007f82ef3fb990 RSI: 0000000000003b71 RDI: 0000000000000023 RBP: 00007f82ef3fb9c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000561b7e0bcac2 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000200000000 R14: 0000381800000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Where is your WIKI? #39

Where is your WIKI? #39

aprokopyev commented May 6, 2020 •

edited

Loading

madaidan commented May 6, 2020

seniorm0ment commented Jul 21, 2020

tsautereau-anssi commented Jul 22, 2020

Lelmister101 commented Dec 1, 2021

Where is your WIKI? #39

Where is your WIKI? #39

Comments

aprokopyev commented May 6, 2020 • edited Loading

madaidan commented May 6, 2020

seniorm0ment commented Jul 21, 2020

tsautereau-anssi commented Jul 22, 2020

Lelmister101 commented Dec 1, 2021

aprokopyev commented May 6, 2020 •

edited

Loading