You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be cool if each website had more information listed about it, so it's easy to see how much IPv4 traffic these websites cause. If entries could be sorted, that'd be even cooler.
I assume routing IPv4 traffic to IPv6 users for popular websites is expensive due to computational resources and additional administrative overhead for such tunnels.
By providing this information it might be possible to see trends in adoption and finding the worst-offenders.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As andir already said we probably won't get any traffic stats for the sites but we could e.g. use the Alexa Top500 ranking to get a sorting of the websites "by size".
It would be cool if each website had more information listed about it, so it's easy to see how much IPv4 traffic these websites cause. If entries could be sorted, that'd be even cooler.
I assume routing IPv4 traffic to IPv6 users for popular websites is expensive due to computational resources and additional administrative overhead for such tunnels.
By providing this information it might be possible to see trends in adoption and finding the worst-offenders.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: