You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
this seems to be different from #3, aevi produces 2 entries, one for the lemma aevus, aevi and one for the lemma aevum, aevi. aevum, aevi has a meaning included, aevus, aevi does not
balmas
changed the title
whitaker's: output for aevi is incomplete?
whitaker's: improper handling of forms with masculine and neuter variations?
Aug 8, 2018
this seems to be different from #3,
aevi
produces 2 entries, one for the lemmaaevus, aevi
and one for the lemmaaevum, aevi
.aevum, aevi
has a meaning included,aevus, aevi
does notsame problem for
caesum
vscaesus
and for
frenus
vsfrenum
lacus
vslacum
melus
vsmelum
vs 'melos'piper
pourrus
vspourrum
problemata
vsproblematum
qualus
vsqualum
uterus
vsuterum
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: