Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

LICENSE.md and package.json disagree #127

Open
mcollina opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

LICENSE.md and package.json disagree #127

mcollina opened this issue Jul 13, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@mcollina
Copy link

The package.json reports the license to be ISC, while the LICENSE file reports it to be MIT.

It's quite important that this is fixed as license reporting tools will rightfully report this as problematic.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant