You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #20, we discussed @ddworken's proposal to allow "Specifying two public keys, and accepting the resource if it is signed with both keys. This could be useful to enable only executing a script if it has a signature proving it comes from a specified authority (e.g. Google Analytics) and a separate signature proving that it was independently audited (e.g. by an independent security firm)."
Right now the proposal allows multiple keys, but accepts a match of any asserted key. It seems reasonable to consider giving developers the ability to change that behavior to enforce provenance requirements that are more along the lines of @ddworken's suggestion.
Filing this bug as a potential enhancement we should consider in the future as we get feedback from developers about how they're using this tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In #20, we discussed @ddworken's proposal to allow "Specifying two public keys, and accepting the resource if it is signed with both keys. This could be useful to enable only executing a script if it has a signature proving it comes from a specified authority (e.g. Google Analytics) and a separate signature proving that it was independently audited (e.g. by an independent security firm)."
Right now the proposal allows multiple keys, but accepts a match of any asserted key. It seems reasonable to consider giving developers the ability to change that behavior to enforce provenance requirements that are more along the lines of @ddworken's suggestion.
Filing this bug as a potential enhancement we should consider in the future as we get feedback from developers about how they're using this tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: