New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Default #13

Open

syskovprdap opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Contributor

syskovprdap commented Oct 3, 2024

Currently FI_MULTI_RECV is only defined for non-tagged message. It may be useful to have it supported in tagged message as well.

The question comes to whether a separate bit should be used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment