Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparison with ncnn? #6

Open
crystalpeng opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Comparison with ncnn? #6

crystalpeng opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@crystalpeng
Copy link

Hi, I am new to ncnn and featherCNN, so could you please give me some introdution about the difference between these two framwork? thank you!

@turbo0628
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey dude, thanks for your interest in FeatherCNN. The two frameworks take different technical paths under the hood, so it's hard to explain in a nut shell. From a user's perspective, both frameworks are aiming at delivering high performance for CNN inference computation. FeatherCNN is very recently released so it may have some problems. It also lacks several layer support for some specific neural networks. Currently ncnn is the more stable project after over a years' development. Performance benchmarks will be provided in the wiki later on, but only for FeatherCNN. As the usage of the two frameworks are very similar, I suggest you to try out both frameworks for your own neural network models, and then pick the one you like.

@qxin
Copy link

qxin commented May 24, 2018

Hi, wonderful work! Thanks. running on NVIDIA TX1( Coretex A57 CPU,) with 10threads. speed : Avg speed, ~85 ms.
./feather_benchmark ./data/mobilenet.feathermodel ./data/input_3x224x224.txt 20 10 (No question but ijust want to make a small contribution).

@turbo0628
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you, but why do you want to launch 10 threads on a TX1? I think there are only 4 CPUs.

@iamhankai
Copy link

horse racing mechanism in Tencent?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants