You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could you please update the older scheme to follow ROS Best Practices? Right now the package is in a folder (which can be our meta-package, and that's cool) that is named ROS-Driver-Update which is under ROS-Driver. Neither of those follow ROS naming or project conventions, but rather look like someone copied over from a network drive they are using to version control. This encourages modifying the repo and breaking pulls for little return
Could you please update the older scheme to follow ROS Best Practices? Right now the package is in a folder (which can be our meta-package, and that's cool) that is named ROS-Driver-Update which is under ROS-Driver. Neither of those follow ROS naming or project conventions, but rather look like someone copied over from a network drive they are using to version control. This encourages modifying the repo and breaking pulls for little return
For reference:
ROS Best Practices
ROS Patterns/Conventions
Best regards,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: