You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
I'd like to be able to bind directives in the document directly to Observables on the scope instead of binding those directives to simple scope values that I have to update from safeApply() blocks. For instance, an Observable of booleans bound to directives like ngShow, ngIf, and ngDisabled would be very helpful for complex forms and reduce controller boilerplate.
Is that something you feel fits into the goals of rx.angular.js? Or is that somehow an anti-pattern? I'm somewhat new to RxJS, so I'm genuinely curious. But ReactiveCocoa provides something very similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
But I don't know if that's the best way to go for rx-angular itself. Perhaps a separate set of rx directives built from scratch would be better? Not sure.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I'd like to be able to bind directives in the document directly to Observables on the scope instead of binding those directives to simple scope values that I have to update from
safeApply()
blocks. For instance, an Observable of booleans bound to directives likengShow
,ngIf
, andngDisabled
would be very helpful for complex forms and reduce controller boilerplate.Is that something you feel fits into the goals of rx.angular.js? Or is that somehow an anti-pattern? I'm somewhat new to RxJS, so I'm genuinely curious. But ReactiveCocoa provides something very similar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: