Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question in Nature paper 2015 #71

Open
kdh4win4 opened this issue Dec 27, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Question in Nature paper 2015 #71

kdh4win4 opened this issue Dec 27, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@kdh4win4
Copy link

screen shot 2018-12-27 at 9 01 13 am

Dear Dr. Greg Finak
I don't understand why FS scores gap is 40 times. (0.016 vs 0.651)
what is 'degree-six' exactly ?
I understand that PFS is same though.
Thank you for your time.

@kdh4win4
Copy link
Author

It is from the COMPASS paper in Nature Biotechnology 2015 online methods first page

@gfinak
Copy link
Member

gfinak commented Jan 3, 2019

The polyfunctionality score assigns more weight to responses in high degree cell subsets (cell subsets that express more cytokines). That's why the six degree subset gets more weight in the PFS than in the FS.

@kdh4win4
Copy link
Author

kdh4win4 commented Jan 3, 2019

Dear Greg,
What I don't understand is 40 times gap of FS between single, degree-six, antigen specific subset vs all subsets with degree <4(0,1,2,3).

@gfinak
Copy link
Member

gfinak commented Jan 3, 2019

Compare the definition of the PolyfunctionalityScore() function against the FunctionalityScore() function to understand how they differ.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants