We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There's a few triples in this file that ... lack a meaningful property.
From RDAPolarity.nt:
http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1001 <notation_0__et> "1001"@et . http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1002 <notation_0__et> "1002"@et . http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1003 <notation_0__et> "1003"@et .
From RDAPolarity.xml:
<skos:Concept rdf:about="http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1001" xml:lang="en"> ... <notation_0__et xml:lang="et">1001</notation_0__et>
and so on.
Its been there for awhile (since 4.0.8 anyways), I just noticed it recently
Richard
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There's a few triples in this file that ... lack a meaningful property.
From RDAPolarity.nt:
http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1001 <notation_0__et> "1001"@et .
http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1002 <notation_0__et> "1002"@et .
http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1003 <notation_0__et> "1003"@et .
From RDAPolarity.xml:
<skos:Concept rdf:about="http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAPolarity/1001" xml:lang="en">
...
<notation_0__et xml:lang="et">1001</notation_0__et>
and so on.
Its been there for awhile (since 4.0.8 anyways), I just noticed it recently
Richard
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: