Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Manifests not taking account of expanded procedurals #15

Open
compso opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Manifests not taking account of expanded procedurals #15

compso opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@compso
Copy link

compso commented Apr 3, 2023 •
edited
Loading

we have a had a case where multiple expanded procedurals no longer work with crypto_object or crypto_asset crytomatte AOVs due to the ^ character in the start of the object name. It is most reproducible with 3 or more of the same procedural example attached

cryptomatte_expanded_procedurals.zip
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@compso