Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reordering lines on a large scale #156

Open
lcerrato opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

reordering lines on a large scale #156

lcerrato opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@lcerrato
Copy link

lcerrato commented Dec 4, 2015

Considering that CTS labels are not inherently meaningful, renumbering a work is not problematic.

I'm curious as to whether we want to delete the old numbering data. It seems to me that someone working with a text may find the traditional print derived numbers useful as place holders and if commenting these out is not problematic, wouldn't we want to keep them, especially in a case where the renumbering radically departs from the traditional format.

When working in an xml file sometimes the number is best way to navigate, particularly if there are variants that are going to trip up a content search.

I fully understand we should be moving past this — but I don't think we are there yet speaking as an editor. I'm willing to be persuaded that I'm missing something here.

An example found in Claudian: /stoa0089/stoa004/stoa0089.stoa004.perseus-lat2.xml
compare at

PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit@3c04319#diff-da145cc17ad6bbda37d1c9c1dbece809

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant