-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TEI/Epidoc : //note/lemma is incorrect. #147
Comments
Or change to and then have the lemma in ? |
Is it the example here? |
Bumping this issue again, as I found another one and we did not give an answer I think. In phi0474.phi024.perseus-lat1.xml quod
<note>
<lemma>quod</lemma> quia
<hi rend="italics"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ς</foreign>B</hi>
</note> diebus festis ludisque publicis, omnibus forensibus negotiis intermissis, u I assume we would go with the Inline apparatus criticus I would propose : quod <note>
<app type="alternative">
<lem>quod</lem>
<rdg wit="ς">quia</rdg>
</app>
</note> or <app type="alternative">
<lem>quod</lem>
<rdg wit="ς">quia</rdg>
</app> |
I like the idea of using the app crit markup |
Sounds like a plan. |
Your guesses look good to me. Thinking of the Perseus CSS, of which I don't know anything, does it matter if we put the "quod" in the app/lem only (option 2), or if we leave it in the text as well (option 1)? Personally I'd prefer option 2, I think, which doesn't repeat the word. Otherwise it's all fine! |
Thanks all of you ! |
@simonastoyanova I don't think it would be duplicated here. Looks like it is just an illustration to show that the note is attached to the quod. (Unless I'm reading it wrong). It's a matter of whether you want a note or inline in a case where the original offers no precedent. If there's a note in the original text, I would keep the note. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise. |
Thanks, this answers my question. Of course, we keep the note if it’s there. On Thursday, 29 October 2015, Lisa Cerrato [email protected] wrote:
Simona Stoyanova Digital Humanities |
In this context, and the fact that actually, the use of Automatic treatment is far too complex to be dealt with. This way I don't lose information, achieve epidoc compliancy and we can look at it later for transforming the note into a real critical apparatus. |
Example
What should we do with //note/lemma ? Transform it to //note/w@lemma="text"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: