Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TEI/Epidoc : //note/lemma is incorrect. #147

Open
PonteIneptique opened this issue May 28, 2015 · 11 comments
Open

TEI/Epidoc : //note/lemma is incorrect. #147

PonteIneptique opened this issue May 28, 2015 · 11 comments

Comments

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member

Example

What should we do with //note/lemma ? Transform it to //note/w@lemma="text"

@simonastoyanova
Copy link
Collaborator

Or change to and then have the lemma in ?

@lcerrato
Copy link

Is it the example here?
iam prope lux aderat, qua qua cum me discedere Caesar
Looks like a variant with being used to designate that the "qua" has a variant of "qua cum"

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

Bumping this issue again, as I found another one and we did not give an answer I think.
It's exactly what you said @lcerrato , this is a variant. The question is how to transform the note into something more usable :

In phi0474.phi024.perseus-lat1.xml

quod
<note>
  <lemma>quod</lemma> quia 
  <hi rend="italics"><foreign xml:lang="grc">ς</foreign>B</hi>
</note> diebus festis ludisque publicis, omnibus forensibus negotiis intermissis, u

I assume we would go with the Inline apparatus criticus

I would propose :

quod <note>
 <app type="alternative">
    <lem>quod</lem>
    <rdg wit="ς">quia</rdg>
 </app>
</note>

or

 <app type="alternative">
    <lem>quod</lem>
    <rdg wit="ς">quia</rdg>
 </app>

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

Ping @lcerrato @simonastoyanova

PonteIneptique added a commit to PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2015
@balmas
Copy link
Contributor

balmas commented Oct 29, 2015

I like the idea of using the app crit markup

@lcerrato
Copy link

Sounds like a plan.

@simonastoyanova
Copy link
Collaborator

Your guesses look good to me. Thinking of the Perseus CSS, of which I don't know anything, does it matter if we put the "quod" in the app/lem only (option 2), or if we leave it in the text as well (option 1)? Personally I'd prefer option 2, I think, which doesn't repeat the word. Otherwise it's all fine!

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all of you !

@lcerrato
Copy link

@simonastoyanova I don't think it would be duplicated here. Looks like it is just an illustration to show that the note is attached to the quod. (Unless I'm reading it wrong). It's a matter of whether you want a note or inline in a case where the original offers no precedent. If there's a note in the original text, I would keep the note. But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
But I don't see the current Perseus implementation having any bearing on the ultimate decision as this won't appear in P4 so current Perseus practice in terms of display is not a deciding factor.

@simonastoyanova
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks, this answers my question. Of course, we keep the note if it’s there.

On Thursday, 29 October 2015, Lisa Cerrato [email protected] wrote:

@simonastoyanova I don't think it would be duplicated here. Looks like it
is just an illustration to show that the note is attached to the quod.
(Unless I'm reading it wrong). It's a matter of whether you want a note or
inline in a case where the original offers no precedent. If there's a note
in the original text, I would keep the note. But I'm willing to be
convinced otherwise.
But I don't see the current Perseus implementation having any bearing on
the ultimate decision as this won't appear in P4 so current Perseus
practice in terms of display is not a deciding factor.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.<
https://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/zFWKpwfFKD2ElnCmhMTcU9CU-Z16B3KeyQpV59iYDE7To_drc9xk-MhWFYwtqxUkIS75ubP307smWcej4PU64HvAvQoT6RuW2ZCsQ7OahyPsTIv7jl3AK-Wj49uJQohseNeLnp1_g2YYV_RV5vgwZlqTXoiQiQ=s0-d-e1-ft#https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AEtm5yhq7LNGhdNkP8-IPNYONEzn9xP7ks5pAjp-gaJpZM4EtRBM.gif

Simona Stoyanova
Research Associate

Digital Humanities
Department of Computer Science
University of Leipzig
Augustusplatz 10
04109 Leipzig, Germany

@PonteIneptique
Copy link
Member Author

In this context, and the fact that actually, the use of <note> is far from being harmonized, I went with <note><app><lem>hospitiisque</lem></app>..

Automatic treatment is far too complex to be dealt with. This way I don't lose information, achieve epidoc compliancy and we can look at it later for transforming the note into a real critical apparatus.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants