You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
In addressing issue #6, we ended up breaking backward compatibility because we moved the NotesType construct from the OVAL Definitions Model to the OVAL Common Model. As a result, when pre-OVAL 5.11 content is validated against OVAL 5.11, it is finding oval-def:notes and oval-def:note elements, but, is expecting oval:notes and oval:note elements.
Please see the following thread for more information.
There is one issue, the change allows empty elements whereas they weren't allowed previously. I believe we can address this in schematron but I haven't implemented that yet. It could also be addressed with xsd:assert but we'd need to use XSD 1.1 which is not well supported.
In addressing issue #6, we ended up breaking backward compatibility because we moved the NotesType construct from the OVAL Definitions Model to the OVAL Common Model. As a result, when pre-OVAL 5.11 content is validated against OVAL 5.11, it is finding oval-def:notes and oval-def:note elements, but, is expecting oval:notes and oval:note elements.
Please see the following thread for more information.
http://making-security-measurable.1364806.n2.nabble.com/5-11-backwards-incompatibility-issue-Suspect-the-fix-for-issue-6-was-the-culprit-tp7586190.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: