Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve SEO #24

Closed
jmckenna opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 11 comments · Fixed by #25
Closed

improve SEO #24

jmckenna opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 11 comments · Fixed by #25

Comments

@jmckenna
Copy link

jmckenna commented Jun 26, 2024

  • try googling a sample EPSG code, such as "epsg 3978"
  • notice that the spatialreference.org associated page is not highly ranked (if at all)
  • view-source of that page, and you'll see missing meta tags for description, keywords etc (that help search engines crawl the pages)
  • other tips for discovery (this is nothing new) include managing your site in the Google Search Console, setting up a sitemap for your site, etc.

Maybe try adding a description tag first?

For comparison, view-source of https://epsg.io/3978

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @jmckenna
I know that unfortunately we are not very high in the rank. To be honest, I am surprised that in 2024 search engines are making any difference if there is data in the description tag that is already in the content of the page. It would be basically duplicating the text. The main information is already in the title tag (code and name)!

About the sitemap, #17 is there since March

If you let me be evil, I understand that epsg dot io is better ranked: it has a lot of adds from Google. We have none. That makes our page less interesting to be visited for the adds provider... that is also the search engine. But maybe I am too suspicious.

@jmckenna
Copy link
Author

Hi @jjimenezshaw I've found that even in 2024, doing the basics still helps. For example, I notice that we lack a robots.txt, for machines to crawl. (see how-to)

I'm also ok to close this ticket now, someday someone can come back to tackle, and re-open.

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Collaborator

I will add a non restrictive robots.txt (2 lines) and the description and keywords tags... just repeating the information that is already there.
Probably it is more effective that other pages link to ours... but I have no control over that ;)

@neteler
Copy link
Member

neteler commented Jun 28, 2024

This tool is giving some insights:
https://seorch.net --> URL: https://spatialreference.org/

Besides many good SEO test results there are also some issues listed. Summary:

  • No Meta Description found.
  • The <title> Tag is too short: 25 characters.
  • The <title> Tag has too few words: 3.
  • The website text is too short: 54 words. Text length should be more than 400 words.
  • Links without TITLE attribute: 15
  • No <h1> Tags found. (Missing heading)
  • No robots.txt found.

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @neteler that is giving some useful tips.
I run it in a specific CRS, and it gives slightly different (but similar) results. I think what we want to be reached per CRS, that is what people search.

What make me nuts is the "The <title> Tag has too few words: 3." Really? Look at the title of a Google page ;)

@neteler
Copy link
Member

neteler commented Jun 28, 2024

What make me nuts is the "The <title> Tag has too few words: 3." Really? Look at the title of a Google page ;)

Seorch is not my system, I was just the messenger :-)

@jmckenna
Copy link
Author

thanks @jjimenezshaw, worth a try!

@jjimenezshaw
Copy link
Collaborator

Two weeks later... do you (anybody) have any feeling of improvement? (maybe I am too optimistic expecting any change in google in two weeks)

neteler added a commit to neteler/spatialreference.org that referenced this issue Jul 12, 2024
This PR adds a general introduction to what this website is about.
Besides addressing the general audience, this may also improve the SEO ranking (OSGeo#24).
@neteler
Copy link
Member

neteler commented Jul 12, 2024

I have made an attempt to add an intro in #26.

Still, pages like https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3978/ are looking pretty nerdy to me.
For people coming directly to this page, it may not be obvious what this is all about :-)

So, what about adding some text between

EPSG:3978

and

NAD83 / Canada Atlas Lambert

?

jjimenezshaw added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
* Add website intro

This PR adds a general introduction to what this website is about.
Besides addressing the general audience, this may also improve the SEO ranking (#24).

* cleanup list

Co-authored-by: Even Rouault <[email protected]>

* Last Revised -> Last revised in

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Javier Jimenez Shaw <[email protected]>

* Improve wording

Co-authored-by: Javier Jimenez Shaw <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Even Rouault <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Javier Jimenez Shaw <[email protected]>
@neteler
Copy link
Member

neteler commented Sep 19, 2024

Update: trying the search from above again:
https://www.google.com/search?q=epsg+3978

Now (at least here in Germany) this site ranks 3rd, so the situation slowly seems to improve.

@jmckenna
Copy link
Author

Agreed, improving (2nd result here).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants