-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: SNARK proof verification #262
Comments
Hi @julio4 please can I work on this issue |
Hi this seems like a really interesting issue, I'd love to work on it. |
Is it okay if I take this? |
pls, i would love to tackle this issue |
Can I work on this, please? |
Hi @julio4, As you suggested different zk-snark proving schemes, do you think we could divide this issue in 2, and I could provide an example with a proving scheme different than the one the person already assigned is doing ? I think it could be interesting to have several examples showcasing how to use different proving schemes and for different use cases too |
Description
Thanks to the amazing work of garaga it is now possible to verify SNARK proofs on Starknet. We want to show a use case of this with an example of a contract that rely on a deployed verifier to verify one proof and do something with the result.
An opening idea would be age verification where users can prove they are above a certain age without revealing their birth date.
Criteria:
Resources:
ODHack
To be eligible for additional rewards, be sure to review and follow the ODHack Common Guidelines and Contributing Guidelines.
Be sure to join the telegram group and introduce yourself.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: