Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

See if checking for nans is necessary #46

Open
sgill2 opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

See if checking for nans is necessary #46

sgill2 opened this issue Mar 29, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@sgill2
Copy link
Collaborator

sgill2 commented Mar 29, 2017

There's a conditional part of the log(accept) that checks for if the energy is nan and immediately rejects it. Going by nan logic, they shouldn't be accepted if they pop up in the ≥ conditional, so checking for nans explicitly might not be needed.

@sgill2 sgill2 self-assigned this Mar 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants