-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use rfc7807bis JSON-LD Context #224
Comments
Once it is there we could use it. We'll see how it will end, but I believe the |
Public accessible hosting of the |
I can see three solutions here, all fine to me:
|
We should have the context dereferancable directly from hydra too. |
Even though no terms within it are defined by Hydra? Why can't we refer to rfc7808bis' location? |
We can, when it arrives but I don't expect that too soon |
Work has begun updating RFC 7807 with rfc7807bis. With the opportunity this gives, I've suggested in ietf-wg-httpapi/rfc7807bis#10 to create an official JSON-LD context for
application/problem+json
. If that is implemented, we should consider replacing Hydra's JSON-LD Context forproblem+json
defined in #178 with the one defined by rfc7807bis.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: