You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While researching some issues with Cognizant / Oversight assignment, @gsa-suk discovered that a lot of historical Census records are duplicated in the baseline table. Some appear to be "real" and others possibly the result of some internal testing that got overlooked. For example:
report_ID
source
date_added
001
Census
2023-10-11
002
CENSUS
2021-03-04
In the example above, it appears that all entries with source=Census (initial cap) have the same date of 2023-10-11, suggesting they were all created or at least updated at the same time as part of some batch operation. Entries with source=CENSUS (all cap) appear to have unique dates.
As far as we can tell, this doesn't impact functionality, but it is confusing and could cause problems in the future if the cog assignment and calculation logic changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While researching some issues with Cognizant / Oversight assignment, @gsa-suk discovered that a lot of historical Census records are duplicated in the
baseline
table. Some appear to be "real" and others possibly the result of some internal testing that got overlooked. For example:In the example above, it appears that all entries with
source=Census
(initial cap) have the same date of2023-10-11
, suggesting they were all created or at least updated at the same time as part of some batch operation. Entries withsource=CENSUS
(all cap) appear to have unique dates.As far as we can tell, this doesn't impact functionality, but it is confusing and could cause problems in the future if the cog assignment and calculation logic changes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: