-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add estimates of uncertainty to metab.mle and metab.kalman #71
Comments
I think this could be done. One challenge is adding that while keeping output consistent across models that cannot estimate uncertainty (Bookkeeping). Just something to think about. |
Bookkeeping can't get it For least squares, we can get it from the parameter s.e.'s. On this line [ For mle and kalman we get it from the Hessian For Bayesian we get it from the posterior. As a matter of fact, for We can add the s.e.'s as an attribute. PROBLEM: Pending Jake's other question, I think part of the solution might On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Luke Winslow [email protected]
|
Hmmm.... could there just be thorough documentation on what is required to get a Hessian (i.e. if the user wanted to mess around with the optim method)? |
Also I thought I read somewhere that it's not good to use Hessian matrix if residuals are autocorrelated, which may be the case for some metab days, but @rBatt you probably know better than me. |
Can we create uncertainty estimates using Hessian matrix? or another way from the optimization algorithm?
A slower approach is to add a bootstrapping function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: