Replies: 2 comments
-
idk - could just forcefully take-over the Β© symbol to mean "coin" or "token" πΌ Examples: yes, i am semi-serious |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Moved this to a discussion, not an issue that needs resolving but an interesting conversation to have. I also don't love the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
To align with a dank meme from ETHPortland 2022 (aka InterchainPortland 0!),
and pending better mechanisms to deal with purchasable
cw20
governance,I propose the following simple UI amendment in the meantime:
π’π’π’ switch governance token prefix to β¬ to subliminally signal the intended use to be governance π³π³π³
Why? governance should be earned through a process legitimated over those who choose to delegate it, not bought, lest we fail to shift the status quo, and worse, end up entrenching existing Kapital and improving its dynamism and allocation efficiencies
Example - DOG DAO
Meta π§ β―οΈ
at DAO DAO and Interchain more broadly, we have a chance to not only ape the existing conventions that work, but also set / discover new ones that come from our unique focus on and learnings from governance innovation
A few that were discussed in our community calls and are good to keep in view for post-v1:
One simple (likely too abstruse) UI cue this suggests is to start every token as
β¬
and to switch to$
as soon as indexerDAO finds an LP with the gov token attached, or someone reports a secondary market and it is verified in a structured manner.over and out β
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions