You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
DAO contracts should allow variable voting thresholds for specific actions.
Examples:
Amending a constitution may require a 75% passing threshold.
Burning someone's governance tokens may require a 75% passing threshold.
Specifying actions and relating them to passing thresholds is one thing, but this problem is tricky for another reason: we do not have an answer to the question, "how will governance change the passing threshold for a particular ansewr?" Consider: if we made a custom proposal module, governance could always vote to replace that module with a new one that nullifies the origional passing threshold (h/t @NoahSaso for this observation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is doable with in a carefully setup DAO with multiple proposal modules and #694.
The DAO main DAO would hold the highest level actions (constitutions, SubDAO admin, upgrades, Authz permissions), while most of the voting would happen through scoped SubDAOs.
DAO contracts should allow variable voting thresholds for specific actions.
Examples:
Specifying actions and relating them to passing thresholds is one thing, but this problem is tricky for another reason: we do not have an answer to the question, "how will governance change the passing threshold for a particular ansewr?" Consider: if we made a custom proposal module, governance could always vote to replace that module with a new one that nullifies the origional passing threshold (h/t @NoahSaso for this observation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: