Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ACI External EPG Subject Labels #321

Closed
markciecior opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #320
Closed

ACI External EPG Subject Labels #321

markciecior opened this issue Oct 5, 2022 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #320
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@markciecior
Copy link

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

  • New module to create/query/delete consumer and provider subject labels under existing external EPGs. These subject labels are matched against subject labels associated with a contract to determine if the contract policy should be applied.

New or Affected Module(s):

  • aci_l3out_extepg_to_subject_label + vz:ConsSubjLbl + vz:ProvSubjLbl

APIC version and APIC Platform

  • V 3.0+ and all.

Collection versions

  • cisco.aci 2.2.0+

References

@markciecior markciecior added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 5, 2022
@lhercot lhercot linked a pull request Apr 27, 2023 that will close this issue
@akinross akinross self-assigned this Feb 26, 2024
@akinross
Copy link
Collaborator

closing due to duplication, will be tracked in #310

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants